Archive

August 2026

Browsing

Panda Express is famous for its orange chicken. But the founders of the iconic fast-casual Asian chain also want to be known for something else: helping their workers realize the American dream.

“I always believe that when you do well, you know, personally, then you can go out and take care of other people,” said Andrew Cherng, who is co-founder, co-chair and co-CEO of Panda Express along with his wife, Peggy Cherng.

“You want people to do well,” he said. “And you want to treat them well.”

Cherng measures progress in part by how many of his managers make $100,000 or more annually. He also tracks whether those managers can afford to buy homes, and he considers that a barometer of his own success.

Yet over the past decade, that American dream of homeownership has slipped out of reach for millions of middle-class families.

With low housing stock across the country, mortgage rates hovering at 6.8% and home prices in some cities at record levels, there is little relief in sight.

Panda Express co-CEO Peggy Cherng wants to help employees establish their careers and “mark that accomplishment by owning a home.”NBC News

Immigrant families are also less likely to own their homes than families headed by native-born U.S. residents, according to census data. Experts point to several factors that are likely to contribute to the disparity, including limited employment and income prospects, language barriers and inconsistent access to banks and financing.

Peggy Cherng said the couple recognize elements of their own journeys in those of their employees. “Most of our associates are first-generation immigrants,” she said.

Andrew was born in China and immigrated to the U.S. in 1966 after having grown up in Taiwan and Japan. Peggy was born in Myanmar and raised in Hong Kong.

The couple met at the University of Missouri and opened their first Panda Express in 1983 in Glendale, California. At the time, they envisioned it as a casual offshoot of Panda Inn, the full-service Chinese restaurant Andrew opened with his father in the early 1970s.

That immigrant experience remains central to how the couple run the business today, particularly a focus on investing in their employees, whom they consider their extended family.

Today, Panda Express is America’s largest Asian restaurant chain, with more than 2,500 locations across 49 states and restaurants in 12 countries. The privately held company employs around 55,000 people and generates around $7 billion in annual sales, according to data compiled by market research firm Technomic.

For Andrew, the foundation of that success is built from the ground up — starting with his employees.

“How do we help these people to have a better life? That’s our mission,” he said in an interview at the company’s headquarters outside Los Angeles, part of NBC News’ “Business in America” initiative.

Peggy said, “Our mission, our calling, is how we are able to help more associates realize their American dream, establish their business, their career, but most importantly, mark that accomplishment by owning a home.”

And despite the long list of obstacles to first-time homeownership, Andrew wants to help his Panda Express employees focus on what is possible rather than what stands in their way.

“We actually help everybody to think about owning a home very quickly,” he said.

Many of the managers he hires initially seem to view the position as just another job, he said, not a potential career path.

Managers “have to do a lot of things,” he said. “We teach them [those skills], but to have a good life, you turn that person from being sort of ‘task-based’ to ‘life-based.’”

That transformation, according to Andrew, often instills a deeper sense of purpose in his employees — one that extends to caring for others and their communities.

“We get people to see that quickly and see it clearly,” he said.

This post appeared first on https://www.nbcnews.com

House and Senate Republicans on Friday criticized President Donald Trump’s decision to suspend tariffs on ground beef imports, with lawmakers from agricultural states decrying the impact Trump’s decision will have on farmers.

Nebraska’s GOP senators, Deb Fischer and Pete Ricketts, said in separate posts on X that Trump’s decision was unwise.

“I’m extremely disappointed by this decision from the White House,” Fischer wrote. “We all want lower grocery prices, but as I’ve said for months, we cannot do it at the expense of American producers. Flooding the market with foreign beef hurts our livestock industry.”

Ricketts wrote: “I appreciate the Administration’s work to lower grocery prices. Short term policy shifts do not equal long term solutions. Flooding the market with lower quality beef compromises Nebraska farmers and ranchers.”

The president announced Friday on Truth Social that “the United States will allow up to 300,000 metric tons of product for ground beef to be imported with no out of quota tariff. We have a commitment that this beef will be sold at 25 percent below current market prices.”

Beef prices have gone up in recent years, in part due to reduced domestic supply.Al Drago / Getty Images

Trump did not say which companies that import beef had agreed to this commitment or what countries would supply the meat.

Explaining his decision, the president pledged that this deal “will reduce prices for Americans while giving space for our Great American Beef Herd to grow again.”

Sen. Tim Sheehy, R-Mont., also cited the hardships American cattle farmers would face as a result of the president’s decision and referred to conversations he’s had with Trump about this issue.

“The President’s heart is in the right place on wanting lower prices for the American people, and beef prices have been impacted by the Mexican screwworm,” Sheehy wrote on X. “But the reality is this action will make it more difficult for American ranchers to rebuild our herd and bring prices down for the American people. And most importantly, this will harm our ranching families who feed the nation.”

Rep. Ashley Hinson, R-Iowa, who is running for Senate and received Trump’s endorsement in the race, also panned his announcement, writing in a post on X, “I want to lower prices but this is a bad idea.”

Hinson said that instead of allowing beef imports without tariffs, “We should be focused on cutting red tape for cattle producers, lowering the cost of production, and supporting market-based solutions to support Iowa producers and lower costs for consumers.”

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, writing in his custom shorthand on X, also expressed concern about Trump’s announcement, writing that “USA cattlemen shld always be put 1st thru America 1st policies.”

Grassley also expressed a “need 2keep up progress fighting screwworm+ expanding domestic herd.”

On Friday, the president defended his decision when asked at Joint Base Andrews about the criticism he was facing from fellow Republicans.

“Well, we want to get the beef prices down, so we’ll get them down a little bit, and that’s what people want. That’s what the voters want, and that’s what I want,” he told reporters. “The ranchers are great. They’re my people. I love the ranchers. They’ve done a fantastic job, but they admit that we need a little help, and in order to get the prices down, so that’s what we’re doing.”

The White House did not immediately respond to NBC News’ request for comment on the lawmakers’ criticisms of Trump’s plan.

U.S. cattle ranchers have faced headwinds for years that have sent beef prices higher, including shrinking supply. According to the American Farm Bureau Federation, the United States’ current cattle herd is the nation’s smallest since 1951.

A flesh-eating screwworm that targets cattle was also detected in the U.S. earlier this year for the first time in decades, further threatening cattle herds.

Trump first floated the idea of lowering imports on beef last year, but the notion was quickly shot down by a similar group of GOP senators from agricultural states.

“I represent a beef-producing state. We have four times as many cattle as people,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said at the time, explaining his opposition.

On Friday, leaders for a top industry group representing cattle farmers, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, also said they were “disappointed” with Trump’s announcement.

“NCBA is disappointed by the President’s statement,” said Colin Woodall, the group’s chief executive officer. “While America’s cattle producers share the goal of keeping groceries affordable for consumers, flooding the market with government-subsidized, below-market beef is not the way to rebuild the American cattle herd.”

“Today’s announcement and other market interventions throw cold water on the prospect of herd expansion and sacrifices long-term stability for short term messaging,” Woodall added.

This post appeared first on https://www.nbcnews.com

For a rocket company, SpaceX is spending a lot of money to build out its AI capacities.

Too much, according to investors.

The company reported revenue in its first quarterly update as a public company that surpassed analysts’ expectations. Most of its revenue came from its Starlink satellite offering.

But investor focus turned to capital expenditures related to its xAI unit, which runs the Grok AI service. Those hit $15.8 billion, higher than expectations of $13.09 billion, according to Bloomberg News data, and about double the previous quarter. The AI spending also accounted for most of SpaceX’s overall $18.4 billion quarterly spending on capital expenditures.

The report caused SpaceX shares to reverse a healthy run-up during regular trading hours Tuesday. The stock fell over 10% before Wednesday’s market open, after having surged 9% ahead of its report Tuesday.

Musk at Tesla’s Gigafactory in Grünheide, Germany, in March 2022. Patrick Pleul / AFP via Getty Images file

SpaceX immediately became a multitrillion-dollar company after a record-setting IPO on June 12 — but nearly just as quickly, it erased $1 trillion in value as the stock plunged amid anticipation of insider stock sales and broader jitters about the pace of AI spending.

Still, it continues to enjoy a market valuation of more than $1 trillion, making it one of the most valuable companies in the world. The stock got an additional boost Tuesday when the company announced a deal with Nvidia to partner on a future satellite project.

That announcement sent shares of other data center infrastructure providers like AMD lower. SpaceX’s strong results in its Starlink connectivity division also knocked shares of major wireless carriers, including AT&T and Verizon, as well as Viasat, which now faces competition from SpaceX for providing uplinks on airplanes.

Investor speculation that SpaceX may try to merge with its sister company Tesla has grown. That would give Elon Musk even more control over his multifaceted technology empire than he already exerts.

The vast majority of SpaceX’s stock is privately held, with just 5% of the 13.9 billion shares trading on the open market.

Along with Musk, who owns about 42%, the other shareholders are known to regulators as “insiders” and have been barred so far from selling their shares.

That “lockup period” will expire Wednesday, when up to 20% of the total SpaceX shares held by insiders may be sold on the open market.

More shares on the market equals more supply, which means the price per share is likely to fall further.

But some retail investors aren’t concerned by the steep drop in SpaceX’s share price.

Forde Todd, 20, received three shares of SpaceX stock as part of the company’s IPO, then bought and sold several more on the open market.

Todd told NBC News he plans to hold on to his IPO shares despite the stock’s plunge.

“I’m in it for the love of the game — like, I’m in it for SpaceX,” Todd said. “I truly believe in this company.”

“At the end of the day, everybody is going to want a part in the space economy,” he added.

This post appeared first on https://www.nbcnews.com

New York’s attorney general sued prediction market operator Kalshi on Friday, claiming that its platform violates state laws against illegal gambling.

In a petition filed in a state court in Manhattan, Attorney General Letitia James said Kalshi failed to obtain a New York State Gaming Commission license to operate its platform, where people trade based on the predicted outcomes of sports, elections and other events.

The attorney general said such platforms can encourage problem gambling, including by people under age 21, and endanger people’s financial, emotional and physical health.

She filed similar petitions in April against two other prediction market operators, Coinbase Financial Markets and Gemini Titan, saying all three companies’ so-called event contracts were “quintessentially” gambling.

“New York’s gambling laws protect children from underage betting and help combat gambling addiction,” James said in a statement. “No matter what they call themselves, prediction markets like Kalshi are gambling platforms, plain and simple.”

New York Attorney General Letitia James in 2025.Michael M. Santiago / Getty Images

CFTC Challenges New York

Prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket have soared in popularity since the 2024 U.S. presidential election, when they fared better than pollsters in predicting Republican Donald Trump’s victory over Democrat Kamala Harris.

Their growth has sparked a flurry of lawsuits and countersuits over the authority of individual U.S. states, rather than the federal government, to regulate the industry.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission has claimed exclusive oversight and challenged regulatory activity in at least nine states including New York, which it sued in April.

“It’s sad to see this type of political theater from the leadership in our own state,” New York-based Kalshi said in a statement. “States can’t just shut down a federally licensed exchange.”

Less than one hour before New York sued Kalshi, the CFTC filed an “emergency” motion in Manhattan federal court to stop the state’s enforcement activity, calling it “overreach” that would irreparably harm the agency and markets it regulates.

The CFTC filing followed Wednesday’s rejection by the federal appeals court in Manhattan of Kalshi‘s request to avoid being subjected to New York’s gambling laws, while it appeals U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres’ refusal on July 8 to issue an injunction against the state.

Kalshi had preemptively sued New York last October to block enforcement.

According to New York’s petition, Kalshi‘s prediction markets are gambling because people can wager on events whose outcomes they don’t control, such as who will win the Super Bowl or the reality TV show “Big Brother.”

New York also objected to Kalshi letting 18- to 20-year-olds use its platform, despite a minimum age of 21 under state law for mobile sports betting.

“Kalshi has chosen to ignore New York’s gaming laws, which exist to protect consumers, prevent problematic gambling, deliver funding for critical public services, and ensure that every company plays by the same rules,” New York Governor Kathy Hochul said in a statement. “This choice has consequences.”

At least four states — Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada and Washington — have won court orders restricting Kalshi‘s activities.

In refusing to stop potential New York enforcement activity, Torres found the state’s interests in preventing gambling addiction, preserving the integrity of sports, and avoiding ​a proliferation of unregulated contracts “heavily” outweighed Kalshi‘s interests in ensuring the primacy of federal law and avoiding “intractable” technology issues for customers.

New York’s lawsuit seeks a halt to Kalshi‘s alleged unlawful conduct, the forfeiture of illegal gains, civil fines equal to triple those gains, and restitution to customers.

This post appeared first on https://www.nbcnews.com